10 Best Greenhouse Alternatives & Competitors in 2025

Greenhouse has been a long-time choice of recruiters across company sizes, but the clunky UI and complicated reporting are holding hiring teams back from meeting recruiting needs in competitive hiring markets.

Strongly agree with these views, and looking for Greenhouse alternatives for your team? Here are 10 Greenhouse alternatives for your business to consider for your hiring needs in 2025.

10 Best Greenhouse Alternatives Quick List

1. Kula: Best for AI-native recruiting workflows
2. Ashby: Best for customizable recruiting analytics
3. Lever: Best for ATS + CRM recruiting
4. Workable: Best for small-team hiring
5. BambooHR: Best for HR and recruiting platform 
6. SmartRecruiters: Best for enterprise-scale hiring
7. JazzHR: Best for simple startup hiring
8. Zoho Recruit: Best for budget recruiting teams 
9. Bullhorn: Best for staffing agencies
10. Loxo: Best for outbound recruiting agencies

Quick Overview of the top 10 Greenhouse alternatives 

What is Greenhouse?

Greenhouse is an all-in-one hiring platform and an ATS, founded in 2012. 

Greenhouse supports hiring for organizations of all sizes, from early-stage startups to large enterprises, and is a popular choice among recruiters for its comprehensive solution, which has consistently performed well over the years.

Standout features

AI-assisted talent filtering for reviewing applications faster, talent rediscovery to surface strong past candidates, automated hiring workflows with task reminders, structured interview kits that reduce bias, and real-time reporting dashboards with 40+ pre-built reports. 

Pricing

Greenhouse offers custom quotes for its three pricing tiers based on company size and hiring needs.

Why teams move away from Greenhouse

1. Overwhelming onboarding process and complex implementation

Greenhouse's initial onboarding can be overwhelming. When not implemented correctly, it becomes a complicated system that presents a challenge to recruiting teams to manage. 

2. Steep learning curve

Greenhouse has a steep learning curve, which can be challenging for new users and smaller teams who may need significant time to adjust and become adept with the platform.

3. Unintuitive user experience

Many users have repeatedly mentioned the platform's frustrating UI, which requires too many clicks for basic tasks. 

It lacks keyboard shortcuts for important actions, such as application reviews, interview bookings, and candidate rejections, making them unnecessarily time-consuming.

Samantha Stambaugh, HR Business Partner at DeepScribe, shares:

4. Limited reporting flexibility

Generating reports and dashboards in Greenhouse is a slow process as the reporting system is complex and unintuitive for non-technical users. Without a deep understanding of how Greenhouse reporting works, users may struggle to manage and extract meaningful data.

Many users have shared their opinions on G2 platforms about Greenhouse’s reporting limitations. 

Several users on G2 have mentioned challenges with Greenhouse’s reporting usability and customization.

5. Inefficient for small businesses

The Essential plan, targeted for small businesses, lacks many crucial features such as bulk actions, candidate self-scheduling, and custom reporting, which are available in higher tiers. This restricts small businesses from scaling their recruitment process effectively.

To sum it up, Greenhouse is not for:

• Small businesses/startups needing easy onboarding, simple setup, and advanced features‍
• Teams wanting a fast learning curve and an intuitive UX‍
• Non-technical users who want simple, flexible reporting

5 Top Greenhouse alternatives in 2025 for hiring needs

AI-Driven Recruiting Platforms

1. Kula

Best for AI-driven hiring teams

Pricing starts at $399 per month

Kula is an all-in-one ATS platform best suited for companies of all sizes. It helps companies hire up to 5x faster without traditional systems' add-ons, gaps, or compromises.    

Kula stands out for its intuitiveness and AI-native functionality. From sourcing and scoring to interview assessments, Kula supports every hiring stage with bias-free AI capabilities. 

In comparison to Greenhouse:

• Kula is more intuitive and easier to use
• Kula's onboarding process is simple, and teams can easily adapt to the platform
• Kula offers more advanced AI and automation features
• Kula makes it super simple to create and view reports

Standout Features

With Kula:

• Users can automate LinkedIn and email outreach
• Use AI-assisted notetaking, automated transcripts, and auto-filled scorecards to improve debriefs.
• Use advanced AI scoring to filter out candidates in seconds
• Schedule interviews manually or provide self-scheduled links 
• Use conversational AI to extract insight as easily through a natural chat experience.

What made DeepScribe move from Greenhouse to Kula?

DeepScribe moved from Greenhouse to Kula because their previous ATS had a complex interface, rigid workflows, and limited reporting. These issues slowed hiring and required manual effort. 

Kula’s AI-native features, easier scheduling, automated scorecards, and real-time dashboards made hiring faster and reduced operational costs. This helped them cut hiring costs by 30%.

Samantha Stambaugh, Head of Talent at DeepScribe, mentions, "If you're looking to be closer to the cutting edge, you don't want to use an outdated product; Kula is the way to go.”

Pros and Cons

Smart hiring starts with smart tools. Kula's intelligent AI and user-friendly platform do the heavy lifting. Curious? Set up a demo made just for you.

2. Ashby

Best for technical teams 

Pricing starts at $400 monthly for startups

Ashby is an all-in-one ATS best suited for small to midsize companies looking for a comprehensive hiring solution. It provides AI and automation workflows across multiple features and offers 200+ integrations to centralize their recruitment tech stack. 

In comparison to Greenhouse

Provides all essential features for a smaller team plan. Ashby includes native scheduling links, eliminating the need for a third-party tool, unlike Greenhouse, which requires an integration setup. Less expensive than Greenhouse, so a great option for teams that have a budget in mind

Standout features

• AI-assisted application review to filter and prioritize candidates
• Recruiting teams can fully customize hiring stages, interview kits, scorecards, and approval workflows. 
• Automated interview scheduling, AI note-taking with interview summaries
• Conversational report building and AI-powered outreach personalization

Pros & Cons

ATS for Mid-Size Recruiting Teams

3. Lever

Best for mid-size recruiting teams 

Pricing is custom

Lever is modern recruiting software that combines the functionality of CRM and ATS to help companies quickly find and hire top talent. Lever offers AI Companion capabilities and is most suitable for mid-to-large companies.

In comparison to Greenhouse

Lever offers an easier setup with a more straightforward onboarding process for recruiters. Lever reporting lacks customization, while Greenhouse reporting is complex. Provides better candidate engagement features such as SMS communication and mobile-optimized career pages.

Standout features

• Automates notetaking, summarizes interviews, and guides interviewers in real time.

• Automates recruiting operations with customizable workflows, automated approvals, and bi-directional integrations

• Integrates with over 100 HR tools and systems, enabling a connected tech stack

• Visual dashboards, predictive insights, and customizable reports for data-driven decisions.

Pros & Cons

4. Workable

Best for small recruiting teams

Pricing starts at $299/month

Workable is an all-in-one HR software that simplifies the entire recruitment cycle, from sourcing and hiring to managing employee data, time tracking, and payroll. It is the best option for small to mid-sized businesses with a low hiring volume.

In comparison to Greenhouse

Workable is more user-friendly with responsive customer support. Workable is a better option for small businesses and startups, as it is affordable and has an intuitive design. Workable offers a mobile app. 

Standout features

• Job posting and distribution to 200+ job boards
• A no-code careers page builder for creating branded career sites
• AI-powered candidate recommendations and a Chrome LinkedIn extension for one-click candidate sourcing.

Pros & Cons

HR Platforms with built-in ATS

5. BambooHR

Best for HR+ATS teams

Pricing starts at $10/employee

BambooHR is a leading all-in-one human resources (HR) software platform designed to simplify and centralize core HR functions for businesses of all sizes. It offers an easy-to-use system that integrates hiring, onboarding, and employee experience tools into one platform. 

In comparison to Greenhouse

BambooHR includes comprehensive employee experience tools like well-being programs and total rewards management, which Greenhouse lacks. BambooHR automates payroll and HR tasks, whereas Greenhouse focuses primarily on recruitment without payroll functionality. It offers a more intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it ideal for small teams.

Standout features

• A unified HR platform that combines core HR, payroll, benefits, and time tracking
• An integrated applicant tracking system with automated emails, customized workflows with stakeholders, job board integration, and integrated onboarding. 
• AI-powered insights for workforce analytics and customizable HR reporting dashboards.

Pros & Cons

Enterprise Hiring Platforms

6. SmartRecruiters

Best for Enterprise hiring

Pricing is custom

SmartRecruiters combines ATS, CRM, messaging, analytics, and onboarding into a single system for large organizations to manage high application volumes.

‍

The platform is particularly well-suited for fast-growing companies and global enterprises, as its scalable architecture and global compliance capabilities make it a reliable solution for organizations hiring across different regions and markets.

In comparison to Greenhouse

SmartRecruiters is a better option for large-scale hiring, as it allows recruiters to post jobs to 200+ job boards directly, offers built-in candidate discovery and talent rediscovery, and supports extensive integrations with enterprise-level scalability for managing high-volume recruitment.

Standout features

• Automates repetitive recruiting tasks such as screening, scheduling, and coordination.
• Access visual dashboards to track hiring performance
• Communicate with candidates via SMS, WhatsApp, and email
• AI to screen applications and identify the best-fit candidates for open roles
• An AI-powered conversational assistant that answers candidate questions
• Automates interview coordination to reduce manual scheduling

Pros and cons

ATS for Startups and Small Teams

7. JazzHR

Best for Startups and growing teams 

Pricing starts at $110/month

JazzHR is a recruitment platform designed for small and growing businesses that need a simple yet scalable hiring system. It provides an intuitive applicant tracking system that helps teams organize applications, automate routine recruiting tasks, and manage hiring pipelines from a single dashboard.

JazzHR offers tiered plans that grow with a company’s hiring needs, allowing teams to start with basic ATS functionality and upgrade to advanced automation, reporting, and hiring tools as they scale.

In comparison to Greenhouse

If you are a small team in the growing phase, JazzHR offers easier, more structured hiring without the complexity or high cost of enterprise recruiting tools. Compared to Greenhouse, JazzHR can help smaller teams reduce time-to-hire, as it allows hiring managers to adopt the tool quickly and avoid long implementation or training cycles.

Standout features

• Post a job once and automatically publish it across multiple free and paid job boards and social channels.
• Sync interview calendars, use guided interview questions, and apply score-based evaluation templates
• Use visual dashboards to track hiring performance‍
• Automate repetitive recruiting tasks to speed up the hiring process.

Pros and cons

Budget-Friendly Recruiting Tools (Free or Low Cost)

8. Zoho Recruit

Best for small teams on a budget 

Offers a free plan

Zoho CRM is a widely used customer relationship management platform that also works well as a lightweight recruiting tool for small teams. One of its biggest advantages is its free plan for up to three users, making it a practical option for startups or small recruiting teams.

In comparison to Greenhouse

Compared to Greenhouse, Zoho CRM offers a low-cost and lightweight way to manage candidate pipelines, especially for small teams. Its free plan and customizable workflows help recruiters organize candidates, automate follow-ups, and maintain visibility into hiring activities without investing in enterprise ATS tools.

Standout Features 

• Automate repetitive tasks such as follow-ups, reminders, and status updates.
• Uses AI to automate follow-ups, analyze data, flag anomalies, and provide recommendations 
• Use dashboards and reports to track hiring activities, candidate sources, and recruitment performance.

Pros & Cons

Staffing & Recruitment Agencies Tools 

9. Bullhorn 

Best for Staffing agencies 

Offers custom pricing 

‍

Bullhorn is a cloud-based recruitment platform designed primarily for staffing agencies and high-volume recruiting teams. It combines applicant tracking, CRM, automation, and analytics into a single system that helps agencies automate repetitive tasks and focus more on relationship-building. 

In comparison to Greenhouse

Compared to Greenhouse, Bullhorn is better suited for staffing agencies and recruitment firms that manage both candidates and clients. Bullhorn offers more flexibility with both ATS and CRM capabilities in one system, and its pricing typically starts around $99 per user per month, with scalable plans depending on features and customization needs. 

Standout features

• Generate job descriptions, create interview questions, and summarize candidate profiles automatically.
• Use AI Search and Match to instantly identify and rank the best candidates from the database.
• Vendor Management System (VMS) Automation to reduce manual administrative work
• Offer visual insights and team-level and company-level views of recruiting performance.

Pros & Cons

10. Loxo

Best for Recruiting agencies 

Offers free plan 

Loxo is a modern ATS and recruiting CRM platform built specifically for recruitment agencies, executive search firms, and staffing companies. By centralizing workflows and embedding AI across sourcing, outreach, and candidate management, Loxo helps recruiting teams reduce manual tasks.

In comparison to Greenhouse

Loxo is primarily for recruitment agencies, executive search firms, and outbound recruiters. Greenhouse relies more on external sourcing tools and integrations while Loxo includes a large built-in talent database to search millions of profiles directly within the platform. It helps recruiters generate candidate pipelines inside the ATS, rather than switching between sourcing tools and the ATS.

Standout Features

• Use proprietary AI, Loxo generates candidate shortlists, summarizes notes, and automates recruiter outreach.
• Connect sourcing, CRM, and outreach workflows to create repeatable, automated recruiting workflows.
• Enables recruiters to run automated email and messaging campaigns at scale.
• Centralizes recruiting data, analytics, and candidate interactions to help firms understand pipeline performance

Pros & Cons

How to switch from one Greenhouse to another ATS

Step 1: Greenhouse allows data export through CSV files or API access, which can then be imported into your new ATS. Before importing, clean and organize the data.

Step 2: Document your existing Greenhouse stages and rebuild them in the new ATS to maintain consistency in your hiring process.

Step 3: Reconnect your integrations for job postings, candidate communication, and data syncing to continue smoothly.

Step 4: After migration, the final step is onboarding your recruiting team. Most ATS (Applicant Tracking System) implementations take 2–6 weeks, depending on the complexity of workflows, integrations, and the volume of historical data being transferred.

The most important part for your team remains step four: tool onboarding and implementation. It is important to choose a tool that offers a simple onboarding process, so your team can get started in a short time.

How recruiting leaders should choose the right Greenhouse alternative

1. Start with the hiring workflow, not the feature list

Look at the platform’s workflows for core capabilities such as applicant tracking, job distribution, candidate pipeline management, interview scheduling, and reporting. If these core functions are weak or require multiple external tools, the system will create more complexity.

2. Prioritize usability for recruiters and hiring managers

An ATS is used daily by recruiters, hiring managers, and coordinators. If the interface is complicated or requires heavy training, adoption will drop quickly. 

3. Look closely at onboarding and migration support

Implementation is often the most difficult part of switching ATS platforms. Recruiting leaders should check how the vendor handles candidate data exports, pipeline migration, integrations, and team training.

4.  Understand the pricing model before committing

ATS platforms follow different pricing structures, which can significantly impact long-term costs. Understanding the pricing model helps teams predict costs as hiring scales.

5. Validate claims through real user feedback

Finally, review user feedback on platforms like G2 or Capterra. Customer reviews often reveal practical insights about usability, reporting limitations, support quality, and overall satisfaction that may not appear in product marketing.